Gigabyte GA-H77N-WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	77% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H77N-WIFI (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120823
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	May 24 '21 at 06:05
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	49% Average	Memory 84.6 1-Core 49.5 2-Core 97.2 50% 77.1 Pts	4-Core 80.2 8-Core 89.7 11% 84.9 Pts	64-Core 83.8 5% 83.8 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Gigabyte(1458 3FF1) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.47 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77% Very good	Lighting 74.4 Reflection 45.1 Parallax 133 61% 84.2 fps	MRender 187 Gravity 116 Splatting 109 109% 137 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB 11,256 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 530 Write 394 Mixed 265 88% 396 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 18.4 67% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 91.2 73% 104 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 182%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$84 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 140GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 148 172 177 175 178 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 119 Mixed 73.1 SusWrite 160 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 43,127 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 17 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 14.9 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H77N-WIFI Builds (Compare 245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77N-WIFI

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	50x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	29x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	19x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	18x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x
MX500 1TBCrucial $74Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	18x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 23,732 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $514

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16