Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G630-$37 12,397 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Memory 81 1-Core 69.4 2-Core 139 58% 96.6 Pts	4-Core 131 8-Core 136 18% 134 Pts	64-Core 127 8% 127 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$48 14,082 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 233 230 238 234 230 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	72.4% Very good	Read 254 Write 245 Mixed 229 SusWrite 234 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 52.4 4K Mixed 40.2 124% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 197 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 128%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB 13,068 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 55GB free Firmware: 3.AAF SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 84 86 85 85 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 77.4 Write 51.6 Mixed 45.1 SusWrite 84.6 48% 64.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 53%
hp v255w 8GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 8GB free, PID b107 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.5 4.9 4.4 4.1 4.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	3.96% Terrible	Read 18.4 Write 3.2 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 4.4 7% 6.93 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 5% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.96% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TIMETEC-UD3-1600 2x8GB 893 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.7% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 13.1 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.8 13% 4.4 GB/s	Latency 78.7 51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	117x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	80x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	54x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $155