Asus P9X79 DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140507
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 23 '21 at 18:24
Run Duration	283 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 1,619 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 76.4 2-Core 154 62% 105 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 541 52% 426 Pts	64-Core 981 61% 981 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.17 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.6% Poor	Lighting 35.7 Reflection 39.8 Parallax 36.7 29% 37.4 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 38.9 Splatting 27.5 28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 291GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 91 94 90 96 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 326 Write 160 Mixed 205 SusWrite 93.6 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 27 4K Mixed 25 82% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 26.9 59% 124 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 320GB-$54 6,728 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 140GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 61 61 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 63.5 Write 65 Mixed 45.8 SusWrite 61.1 43% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 59%
Samsung SP1213C 120GB 679 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 71GB free Firmware: SV100-34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 35 34 34 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	20% Very poor	Read 34 Write 39 Mixed 26 SusWrite 35.3 25% 33.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 33%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29 14,402 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 100GB free Firmware: VT100-50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 60 60 60 60 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 58 Write 61.5 Mixed 39 SusWrite 59.6 40% 54.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 38%
Toshiba MK6465GSX 640GB 4,539 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 310GB free Firmware: GJ00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 78 78 80 78 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 79.5 Write 76.5 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 78.5 47% 65.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 48%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB 146 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 260GB free, PID ab21 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 82 82 82 82 82 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 77.3 Write 55.8 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 81.1 87% 65.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 43%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB 4,300 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 389GB free, PID 61b3 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 103 103 103 102 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 102 Write 69.8 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 101 108% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 42%
Generic External 960GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 221GB free, PID 3920 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 124 124 122 126 122 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 151 Write 138 Mixed 124 SusWrite 125 180% 134 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 26 4K Mixed 20 1,632% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 22.2 DQ Write 38.4 DQ Mixed 20.9 2,099% 27.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 164%
Samsung S2 Portable 640GB 712 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 143GB free, PID 1f06 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	2.25% Terrible	Read 1.3 Write 5 Mixed 6.3 SusWrite 3.5 6% 4.03 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 25% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 2.25% Great: 20%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 23GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 12 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 79 Write 14.8 Mixed 19.5 SusWrite 11.9 32% 31.3 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.7 59% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 28%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 4GB free, PID 5567, sandisk Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 8.4 8.5 8.3 8.6 8.4 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 25.3 Write 9.3 Mixed 6 SusWrite 8.4 14% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 2.8 186% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 13%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 32GB 284 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 10GB free, PID dd35, adata Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 22 21 20 23 19 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Read 119 Write 17.5 Mixed 38.3 SusWrite 21.7 51% 49.1 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.6 169% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 2x8GB 474 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.3% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 17.9 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 9 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79 DELUXE Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 DELUXE - $500

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	254x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	162x
Core i7-3960XIntel $265Bench 78%, 2,165 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	35x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	32x
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	31x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	29x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	26x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	16x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	19x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	11x
DDR3 1600G DDR3 1600G Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 12GBAdataBench 52%, 28 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,060

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16