Asus P9X79 DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111222
Uptime	9.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '19 at 12:30
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820 38,674 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 92.9 1-Core 88.2 2-Core 192 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 492 50% 408 Pts	64-Core 491 30% 491 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.17 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.7% Below average	Lighting 39.4 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 37.8 32% 36.1 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 38.5 Splatting 36.6 31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 218GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 93 95 96 93 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 335 Write 159 Mixed 199 SusWrite 92.4 43% 196 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 31.2 4K Mixed 27.5 90% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 27.9 50% 97.7 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 134%
Samsung SP1213C 120GB 679 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 63GB free Firmware: SV100-34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 50 50 49 49 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Read 50 Write 53.5 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 49.7 35% 47.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 33%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29 14,402 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 61GB free Firmware: VT100-50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 59 59 59 59 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 59.3 Write 61.5 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 58.8 40% 54.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 38%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 320GB-$54 6,728 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 144GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 68 69 69 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 83.3 Write 81 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 68.8 53% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 59%
Toshiba MK6465GSX 640GB 4,539 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 391GB free Firmware: GJ00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 77 77 78 77 77 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 82 Write 81.8 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 76 48% 66.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 48%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB 146 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 193GB free, PID ab21 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 72 72 72 72 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 71.5 Write 51.8 Mixed 47 SusWrite 71 80% 60.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 43%
Generic External 960GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 454GB free, PID 3920 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 32 Write 28.8 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 27.6 40% 29.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 6.1 471% 6.67 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 164%
Samsung S2 Portable 640GB 712 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 134GB free, PID 1f06 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 38 38 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 41.5 Write 17 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 38.5 36% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 2x8GB 474 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 18.9 58% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 12.2 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 62.2 64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79 DELUXE Builds (Compare 616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 DELUXE - $500

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	256x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	162x
Core i7-3960XIntel $265Bench 78%, 2,165 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	35x
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	32x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	32x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	29x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	26x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	16x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	19x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	12x
DDR3 1600G DDR3 1600G Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 12GBAdataBench 52%, 28 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,056

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16