Asus H81M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H81M-E  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '21 at 21:45
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 210
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 391
53% 393 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
34.5% Below average
Lighting 43.1
Reflection 48.4
Parallax 56.6
35% 49.4 fps
MRender 47.9
Gravity 43.7
Splatting 33.2
33% 41.6 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 274 286 283 266 256 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 434
Mixed 373
SusWrite 287
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 99.3
4K Mixed 54.2
186% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 132 131 133 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 125
Write 118
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 132
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B2873EH1-CH9 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 15.8
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-E Builds (Compare 1,820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-E - $311

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $548
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback