ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Precision WorkStation T3500

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot Drive	30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Dell Precision WorkStation T3500 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 09KPNV
Memory	21.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorÃ³w
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130528
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '15 at 12:19
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3565 7,121 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 79.6 2-Core 162 55% 121 Pts	4-Core 286 8-Core 440 45% 363 Pts	64-Core 444 28% 444 Pts
Poor: 56% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5382 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Goodram C40 120GB 873 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 35 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 28 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 25 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1835011 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 30 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 236847	30.2% Below average	Read 264 Write 24.2 Mixed 122 30% 137 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 51.8 4K Mixed 3.22 60% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 17.7 DQ Write 57.3 DQ Mixed 2.91 12% 26 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33 44,469 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 188GB free Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 99 43447085 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 486 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 38257459 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 10360 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 239 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 68 488046621 (C2) HDA temperature 29 40 64424509469 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 31 27 43447085 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -61705795130595 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2095152892 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1669847287	68.9% Good	Read 121 Write 119 Mixed 114 89% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.56 115% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 68%
APPLE HD D HTS541010A9E66 1TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 532GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 28.9 Mixed 29.6 38% 29.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.18 56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Precision WorkStation T3500 Builds (Compare 3,423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T3500

CPU
Xeon W3530Intel $287Bench 65%, 5,773 samples	482x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	330x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	243x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	175x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	157x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	128x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	145x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	76x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	55x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	655x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	579x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	325x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $374

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback