Intel X79

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel X79 (all builds)
Memory	56 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200529
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	May 21 '21 at 16:40
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	91%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2660 0 1,318 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Memory 60.4 1-Core 48.6 2-Core 106 43% 71.7 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 357 28% 245 Pts	64-Core 557 34% 557 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Gainward(10B0 0FC6) 1GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	8.21% Terrible	Lighting 9.1 Reflection 11.6 Parallax 12 7% 10.9 fps	MRender 13.7 Gravity 11.9 Splatting 10.7 10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.21% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB 46,239 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 405GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 370 371 371 376 386 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 439 Write 381 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 331 65% 293 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 0.3 19% 6.67 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 15.5 DQ Mixed 0.4 22% 57 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 100%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.1 0 0.1 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 28 Write 23.4 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 0.1 23% 18.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 54%
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.1 3 2.9 3.1 2.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 22.4 Mixed 22.6 SusWrite 3 24% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 42%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-22GXCB0 4TB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0 0 0 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 30 Write 23.7 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 2.1 25% 20.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 66%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 794GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 22 23 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 28.4 Write 23.9 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 22.7 33% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ17RG4BFWA- 4x16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.5% Below average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 17.1 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 5 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	339x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	269x
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples	144x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	126x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	114x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	108x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	64x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	45x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	35x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	127x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	62x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16