Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167 23,407 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Memory 43.4 1-Core 52.6 2-Core 81.4 36% 59.1 Pts	4-Core 60.9 8-Core 58.3 8% 59.6 Pts	64-Core 98.9 6% 98.9 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Clevo(1558 5125) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.4% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 0.5 1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.4% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V-GEN01SM21NT128MT 128GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: T1125A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 193 219 217 177 93 MB/s Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.2% Average	Read 237 Write 215 Mixed 221 SusWrite 187 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 32.8 4K Mixed 11.1 54% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 26.2 51% 101 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8325 FSFF65F-C8KL9 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1334, 1334 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.7% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 10.3 24% 8.33 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.8 14% 4.8 GB/s	Latency 187 21% 187 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16