Asus ROG STRIX Z490-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics4.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z490-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200721
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 20 '21 at 05:28
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900-$281
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Memory 89.5
1-Core 150
2-Core 296
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 581
8-Core 1,088
100% 834 Pts
64-Core 1,994
123% 1,994 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99%
Great: 102%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 1470) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.47
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
4.16% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 8.9
5% 8.4 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.1
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.16%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 183 58 75 28 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,370
Write 919
Mixed 869
SusWrite 96.3
180% 814 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 68
246% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 843
DQ Mixed 221
274% 466 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 163%
Great: 209%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
574GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1324 833 839 843 838 839 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1148
Write 1,158
Mixed 1,036
SusWrite 919
240% 1,065 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 69.8
236% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,296
DQ Write 1,028
DQ Mixed 1,148
863% 1,157 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 227%
Great: 276%
WDC WDS100T2B0A 1TB
856GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 481 482 481 481 482 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 475
Mixed 398
SusWrite 481
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 48.4
167% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 279
229% 326 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 117%
Great: 121%
H/W RAID 1 6TB
1TB free
Firmware: 8136
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 109 111 112 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 101
Write 106
Mixed 96.8
SusWrite 110
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.6
343% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 111%
Seagate ST6000VN0011-1UL17Z 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 140 138 146 152 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 139
Write 144
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 145
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 107%
BUFFALO External HDD 8TB
3TB free, PID 02c1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 151 154 159 160 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 134
Write 118
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 157
165% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
232% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CENTURY MICRO MICRO XMP2.0 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.2% Outstanding
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 26.7
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 27.2
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z490-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z490-F GAMING - $371

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,518
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback