Dell OptiPlex 9020

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell OptiPlex 9020
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 9020  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '21 at 03:45
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 202
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 372
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Dell(1028 05A4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 6.1
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AGI120G06AI138 120GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 173 77 48 47 48 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 445
Write 373
Mixed 312
SusWrite 123
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 19.8
109% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 70
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 28.2
69% 136 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 81%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
115GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 76 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 63.5
Write 59.2
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 76.4
44% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 17.4
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.8
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 9020 Builds (Compare 10,708 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9020

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback