MSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '21 at 03:12
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 166
2-Core 329
106% 196 Pts
4-Core 641
8-Core 955
99% 798 Pts
64-Core 1,222
76% 1,222 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 103
Parallax 64.4
58% 79.5 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 70
Splatting 63
54% 66.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 500GB SSD
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS303225
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1360 479 498 486 499 447 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,215
Write 2,282
Mixed 1,488
SusWrite 628
318% 1,403 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 77.8
286% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 758
DQ Write 1,256
DQ Mixed 1,006
763% 1,007 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 220%
Great: 266%
Samsung PM830 mSATA 256GB
166GB free
Firmware: CXM02D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 389 387 390 388 387 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 474
Write 384
Mixed 308
SusWrite 388
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 27.1
114% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 166
136% 198 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 80%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$54
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 193 192 193 192 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 188
Mixed 91.9
SusWrite 193
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
739GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 104 104 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 102
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 103
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 63%
Mg04aca400n 00LF276 LENOVO 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: TK44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 196 196 198 197 197 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 174
Mixed 103
SusWrite 197
122% 166 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
264% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
2TB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 107 107 108 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 115
Write 114
Mixed 62
SusWrite 107
133% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GF2X08QFHH36-135-K 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 48.7
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 42.8
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 33.5
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 44.1
100% 34.8 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 5,366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $979
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback