MSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '21 at 03:28
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 167
2-Core 333
107% 198 Pts
4-Core 639
8-Core 957
99% 798 Pts
64-Core 1,226
76% 1,226 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Lighting 70.4
Reflection 104
Parallax 64.6
57% 79.6 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 63.8
54% 66.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 500GB SSD
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS303225
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1641 449 502 493 490 475 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,204
Write 2,297
Mixed 1,498
SusWrite 675
322% 1,418 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 85
297% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 764
DQ Write 1,244
DQ Mixed 1,011
764% 1,006 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 226%
Great: 266%
Samsung PM830 mSATA 256GB
167GB free
Firmware: CXM02D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 388 387 388 386 387 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 472
Write 392
Mixed 304
SusWrite 388
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 27.8
118% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 170
137% 199 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 80%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 192 191 193 193 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 190
Mixed 93.7
SusWrite 192
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
739GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 104 104 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 108
Write 91.2
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 103
66% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 63%
Mg04aca400n 00LF276 LENOVO 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: TK44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 196 197 197 197 197 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 172
Mixed 103
SusWrite 197
121% 165 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
256% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
2TB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 106 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 63
SusWrite 107
132% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GF2X08QFHH36-135-K 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 48.8
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 43.1
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 33
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 44.3
99% 34.8 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 5,355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91) - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $922
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback