King SYS-5019GP-TT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemKing SYS-5019GP-TT  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11SPG-TF
Memory249.5 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '21 at 22:44
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6128
CPU, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 71.4
1-Core 109
2-Core 227
74% 136 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 782
76% 625 Pts
64-Core 945
58% 945 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 84%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dom-sh 3ME4 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L20420
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 123 120 123 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 343
Write 118
Mixed 161
SusWrite 121
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 32.4
120% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 79.5
74% 114 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 64%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,184
Write 1,738
Mixed 1,650
413% 1,858 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 81
280% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,124
DQ Write 976
DQ Mixed 1054
789% 1,051 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,163
Write 1,743
Mixed 1,645
411% 1,850 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 84.3
285% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,135
DQ Write 973
DQ Mixed 1,042
784% 1,050 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
WD WUH721414ALE6L4 14TB
13TB free
Firmware: LDGNW240
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 263 235 254 263 254 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 138%
Hitachi HUS726T4TALA6L4 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: VLGNW460
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 228 228 226 227 228 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 125%
Hitachi HUS726T4TALA6L4 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: VLGNW460
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 211 213 213 214 211 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386A8K40BM2-CTD 4x31.8GB
4 of 6 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 59.8
MC Mixed 35.6
123% 42.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 10.7
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 106%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback