Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210305
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 19 '21 at 07:25
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$207
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 67.5
1-Core 151
2-Core 295
90% 171 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 1,014
96% 797 Pts
64-Core 1,426
88% 1,426 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37B9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (163 fps cap detected)
123% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 162
Parallax 163
127% 160 fps
MRender 163
Gravity 163
Splatting 163
133% 163 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 123%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,797
Write 3,152
Mixed 2,218
608% 2,722 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 69.8
250% 93.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1264
DQ Write 1094
DQ Mixed 1,139
865% 1,166 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$130
376GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 421 419 416 414 414 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 402
Mixed 379
SusWrite 417
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 45.5
151% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 179
139% 191 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 100%
Great: 125%
SanDisk SSD Plus 960GB-$90
421GB free
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 175 154 155 179 186 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 244
Write 353
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 173
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 21.4
99% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 35
66% 132 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 78%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 174 173 173 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 155
Mixed 105
SusWrite 173
116% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 169 175 175 174 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 82.6
Write 115
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 172
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.6
209% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
3TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 158 160 159 159 159 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 138
Write 116
Mixed 77.4
SusWrite 157
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3466C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67% Good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 27.3
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,722
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback