Asus X550VX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus X550VX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550VX
Memory21 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170504
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 18 '21 at 20:07
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 199
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 504
52% 421 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 1130) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 7.4
5% 9.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07373
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 324 190 190 188 182 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 439
Write 417
Mixed 376
SusWrite 247
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 33.6
130% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 251
184% 238 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 240%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
371GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 75 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 71.2
Write 78.2
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 76.3
44% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G1A1 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 15.8
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550VX Builds (Compare 1,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550VX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback