Lenovo 80EW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80EW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo B50-80
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateMay 18 '21 at 13:16
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 68.6
1-Core 58
2-Core 90.9
46% 72.5 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 138
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3902) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 5.7
3% 4 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 7.4
5% 5.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 203 164 126 105 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 413
Write 341
Mixed 310
SusWrite 144
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 21.3
98% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 182
157% 231 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-079.A00LF 0467 RMT3170MN68F9F1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.8% Average
MC Read 13
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 12.6
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80EW Builds (Compare 377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80EW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback