bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory3.32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3.32GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory2.5 GB free of 3.32031 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '17 at 08:34
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 234
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 230
31% 233 Pts
64-Core 235
14% 235 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 1GB
Driver: vm3dum64.dll Ver. 8.15.1.32
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.67
Reflection 5.73
Parallax 7.16
4% 5.85 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 2.53
Splatting 8.22
6% 7.04 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 75GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 485
Mixed 503
111% 497 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 34.7
122% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 90.6
DQ Mixed 50.4
51% 82.7 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 92%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
2048, 1024, 256, 64, 8 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 21.3
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 10.7
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback