HP ProDesk 400 G5 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics21% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G5 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83F0
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190411
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMay 16 '21 at 20:09
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$139
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 129
2-Core 258
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 736
78% 621 Pts
64-Core 729
45% 729 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
PwrHis(1787 A56D) 2GB
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
21% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 28
Parallax 35.4
21% 29.7 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 27.1
Splatting 25.2
21% 26 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 128G 128GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07542
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 365 329 260 99 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 476
Write 332
Mixed 354
SusWrite 255
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 38.7
146% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 178
143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
671GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 175 173 175 176 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 174
Mixed 102
SusWrite 175
116% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT4G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.7% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 18.2
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 21.1
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G5 MT Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G5 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback