Asus BM1AF_BP1AF_BM6AF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus BM1AF_BP1AF_BM6AF (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK BM1AF_BP1AF_BM6AF
Memory	11.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180320
Uptime	3.6 Days
Run Date	May 16 '21 at 07:59
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	70% Good	Memory 81.9 1-Core 94.3 2-Core 181 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 344 45% 340 Pts	64-Core 336 21% 336 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B E100) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	4.61% Terrible	Lighting 5.6 Reflection 8.4 Parallax 3.7 5% 5.9 fps	MRender 5.3 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 7.4 5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.61% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4622 Write 3,460 Mixed 3,739 876% 3,941 MB/s	4K Read 237 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 143 612% 170 MB/s	DQ Read 723 DQ Write 533 DQ Mixed 577 445% 611 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 466GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 182 178 177 177 181 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 146 Mixed 89.4 SusWrite 179 107% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 112%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 255GB free Firmware: 17.01H17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 112 112 113 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 107 Write 99.5 Mixed 68.4 SusWrite 112 71% 96.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 24GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 17.6 58% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 19 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 77.1 52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical BM1AF_BP1AF_BM6AF Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus BM1AF_BP1AF_BM6AF

CPU
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	47x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	28x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	28x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	69x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	18x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	7x

RAM
M378B5173DB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,467 samples	11x
BLS4G3D18ADS3.16FK 1315 BLS4G3D18ADS3.16FE 1315 BLS4G3D18ADS3.16FK 1315 BLS4G3D18ADS3.16FE 16GBUnknownBench 62%, 11 samples	4x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $232

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16