HP ZBook 17

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP ZBook 17 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 190A
Memory	27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 15 '21 at 23:39
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	59%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150 22,632 User benchmarks, average bench 63% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Memory 69.9 1-Core 70.7 2-Core 118 53% 86.2 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 407 39% 320 Pts	64-Core 417 26% 417 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 190A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	1.77% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 9 Parallax 3.5 2% 4.8 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 2.5 2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.77% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89 11,245 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231706 SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 204 214 211 207 222 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Read 340 Write 227 Mixed 158 SusWrite 212 52% 234 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 14 4K Mixed 9.3 33% 10.8 MB/s	DQ Read 84.1 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 121 88% 113 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 89%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 750GB 4,800 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 189GB free Firmware: JB2OA3K0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 71 73 73 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 82.4 Write 80.2 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 71.9 46% 63.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ81UG8EFU0-GN-F Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 EBJ81UG8EFU0-GN-F Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 32GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 16 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 16.8 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ZBook 17 Builds (Compare 206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 17

CPU
Core i7-4800MQIntel $150Bench 63%, 22,632 samples	72x
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	56x
Core i7-4900MQIntel $110Bench 68%, 5,651 samples	18x

GPU
Quadro K3100MNvidiaBench 11%, 2,978 samples	114x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	31x
Quadro K5100MNvidiaBench 21%, 641 samples	24x

SSD
MX500 2TBCrucial $146Bench 108%, 44,787 samples	8x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	15x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 2,172 samples	13x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 54%, 1,944 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $296

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16