Micros PCWS 2015

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive25.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicros PCWS 2015  (all builds)
MotherboardMICROS Calpella
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '21 at 17:22
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron P4505
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Memory 43.1
1-Core 39.4
2-Core 92.2
34% 58.2 Pts
4-Core 92.1
8-Core 93.1
12% 92.6 Pts
64-Core 93.4
6% 93.4 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 40%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC300 60GB-$56
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 84 46 54 86 42 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.6% Poor
Read 155
Write 114
Mixed 146
SusWrite 60.4
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 11
33% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 124
91% 118 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
21.6% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 8.9
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback