Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte AB350-Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170619
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 15 '21 at 05:21
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.25 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 62.4
1-Core 93.4
2-Core 188
63% 114 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 331
45% 336 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.2% Poor
Lighting 33.4
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 35.4
27% 36 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 38
Splatting 27
27% 33.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
613GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 125 153 154 155 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 166
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 141
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M2A2400C16 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 CMK8GX4M2A2400C16 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.6% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 26.3
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 22.5
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback