Foxconn H61MX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardFoxconn H61MX  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131225
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '21 at 13:34
Run Duration82 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 168
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 300
41% 303 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250E
PwrHis(1787 2500) 2GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
7.66% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 14.6
7% 12.9 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 10.2
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.66%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 120GB SSD 120GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 216
Write 186
Mixed 188
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 13.2
66% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21.6
DQ Write 81.2
DQ Mixed 17.3
23% 40 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BA160 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.5% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61MX Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H61MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $86
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback