Medion E42019

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion E42019  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B550A4-EM
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateMay 11 '21 at 16:29
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 69.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 226
73% 135 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 465
63% 467 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 25.4
Parallax 19.5
12% 20 fps
MRender 23.8
Gravity 14.4
Splatting 20
16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E12-512G-PHISON-SSD-B16-BB1 512GB
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 884 495 509 510 511 521 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,579
Write 1,971
Mixed 1,489
SusWrite 572
316% 1,403 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 68.8
216% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1203
DQ Write 600
DQ Mixed 564
508% 789 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 206%
Great: 233%
Adata ED600 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 145 145 147 147 147 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD CT8G4DFS8266.C8FD1 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 29.1
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 24.2
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E42019 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E42019

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback