Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160406
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateMay 10 '21 at 16:42
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9370-$183
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 134
60% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 409
39% 321 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 285-$189
Sapphire(174B E305) 2GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.3% Below average
Lighting 40.7
Reflection 44.7
Parallax 53
33% 46.1 fps
MRender 44.2
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 30.4
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$29
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 37 36 58 71 70 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.8% Average
Read 179
Write 90.8
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 59.6
18% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 14.5
70% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 29.2
71% 146 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
207GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 144 137 147 146 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 136
Write 98.7
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 144
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 109%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 173 179 183 182 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 133
Write 140
Mixed 94.9
SusWrite 179
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.9
379% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 90%
Great: 92%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
374GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 73 84 85 91 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 52.7
Write 63.2
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 84.5
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.2
70% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
36GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 66 68 69 71 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 73.7
Write 70
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 68.8
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 68%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
7GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 112 117 101 106 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 120
Write 106
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 104
63% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 19
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 14.5
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FX-GAMING Builds (Compare 246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $329
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback