ECS A68M-C4DL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardECS A68M-C4DL  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '21 at 15:21
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 72.3
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 131
55% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 206
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 325 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.7% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 2
4% 4.8 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 3.8
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.7%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tammuz SSD 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02000009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 68 10 37 32 6.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 439
Write 184
Mixed 257
SusWrite 34.1
50% 229 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 0.9
46% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 20.9
DQ Mixed 31.8
35% 62.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$20
101GB free
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 67 69 70 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 98.4
Write 98.3
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 68.9
59% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
37.1% Below average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 10
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68M-C4DL Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A68M-C4DL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback