Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180712
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 10 '21 at 03:31
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 129
2-Core 255
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 789
78% 634 Pts
64-Core 1,052
65% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12FA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2340 MHz, MLim: 3720 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
158% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 188
Parallax 220
178% 209 fps
MRender 237
Gravity 206
Splatting 163
161% 202 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 158%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,527
Write 2,213
Mixed 1,453
458% 2064 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 68.2
223% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 462
DQ Write 397
DQ Mixed 443
328% 434 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
256GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 481 481 481 440 351 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 480
Mixed 424
SusWrite 452
105% 464 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 50.6
152% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 369
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 112%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
658GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 177 182 182 182 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 165
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 181
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 103%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 35.1
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 30.1
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 110%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,868 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $791
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback