TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock Z68 Pro3-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Pro3-M  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 22:33
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 181
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 354
48% 356 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 73.4%
 Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 35.3
Parallax 33.3
27% 33.9 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 34.5
Splatting 24
26% 32.4 fps
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 26.6%
 Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT250MX500SSD1N 250GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 416 423 426 426 424 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 405
Mixed 419
SusWrite 424
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 42.5
139% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 281
235% 340 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 105%
 Great: 127%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$96
931GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 433 438 441 440 440 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 426
Mixed 433
SusWrite 440
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 46.9
150% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 367
276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑
This bench: 110%
 Great: 137%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
486GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 167 169 170 169 169 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 49
Write 125
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 168
71% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.6
159% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 62.5%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 99U5471-052.A00LF Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.2
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 50.7%
 Great: 51%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z68 Pro3-M Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Pro3-M

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel  $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples47x
Core i7-2600KIntel  $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples28x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples17x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples13x
GTX 960Nvidia  $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples8x
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples8x
SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples11x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston  $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples5x
Fury 240GBHyperX  $65Bench 71%, 27,826 samples4x
RAM
CMX8GX3M2A1600C11 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C11 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 16GBUnknownBench 51%, 19 samples9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples4x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback