Eluktronics MAX-17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemEluktronics MAX-17  (all builds)
MotherboardEluktronics MAX-17
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210322
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 19:02
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 48.6
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 143
52% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 670
56% 485 Pts
64-Core 1,050
65% 1,050 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Device(1D05 1111) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.48
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 22.1
Parallax 24.8
8% 18.8 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 19.6
15% 18.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HALB-00000 1TB
905GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 692 628 654 734 755 734 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 892
Write 844
Mixed 771
SusWrite 700
180% 802 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 52.6
173% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 596
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 630
418% 505 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 152%
Great: 251%
MANIX4000GB-G4SS 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: EGFM52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 712 634 672 759 781 778 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 786
Write 819
Mixed 724
SusWrite 722
172% 763 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 51.7
167% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 652
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 648
429% 520 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 148%
Great: 466%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 35.1
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 31.3
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAX-17 Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Eluktronics MAX-17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback