Eluktronics MAX-17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemEluktronics MAX-17  (all builds)
MotherboardEluktronics MAX-17
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 07:38
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 51.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 188
65% 118 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 833
77% 643 Pts
64-Core 1,034
64% 1,034 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Device(1D05 1111) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.48
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 13.4
8% 9.73 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 18.5
15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HALB-00000 1TB
906GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 699 684 575 710 801 580 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 840
Write 785
Mixed 659
SusWrite 675
166% 740 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 40.6
122% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 574
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 789
499% 568 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 134%
Great: 251%
MANIX4000GB-G4SS 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: EGFM52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 727 712 586 733 828 863 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 581
Mixed 254
SusWrite 742
100% 433 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 12.5
70% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 600
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 639
424% 513 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 466%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 34.9
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 44.8
SC Mixed 31.9
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAX-17 Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Eluktronics MAX-17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback