Lenovo 80X8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 80X8  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '21 at 15:29
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 74.1
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 136
58% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 223
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 3987) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.84% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 2
Parallax 5.7
5% 4.47 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 0.2
2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.84%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Netac NVME SSD 1 128GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 102 248 345 328 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 875
Write 479
Mixed 473
SusWrite 229
114% 514 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 15.9
101% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 169
152% 221 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 174%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
464GB free
Firmware: AM0Q6E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 112 116 111 116 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 112
Write 110
Mixed 37
SusWrite 113
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
35.9% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 10.3
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 10.9
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80X8 Builds (Compare 435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80X8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback