ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 30B3001KUK

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Lenovo 30B3001KUK (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 102F
Memory	29.5 GB free of 31.999 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160515
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '17 at 07:17
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4@ 3.50GHz 2 User benchmarks, average bench 86% LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	84.7% Excellent	Memory 88.7 1-Core 125 2-Core 242 85% 152 Pts	4-Core 435 8-Core 621 66% 528 Pts	64-Core 622 38% 622 Pts
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000 12,628 User benchmarks, average bench 67% Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 377.48 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (73 fps cap detected)	53.3% Above average	Lighting 61.2 Reflection 72.3 Parallax 67.8 50% 67.1 fps	MRender 73 Gravity 72.6 Splatting 73.3 60% 73 fps
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69 12,601 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 386GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6L0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	290% Outstanding	Read 2,233 Write 1,464 Mixed 1,510 384% 1,736 MB/s	4K Read 51.4 4K Write 239 4K Mixed 61.9 284% 118 MB/s	DQ Read 773 DQ Write 401 DQ Mixed 215 259% 463 MB/s
Poor: 136% ↑ This bench: 290% Great: 262%
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB 6,630 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 238GB free Firmware: DXT01L5Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 942 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 242 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 92 92 87 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 6240 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 34 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (E9) Unknown 199 199 35900 (EA) Unknown 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 99 (EC) Unknown 99 99 62 (ED) Unknown 99 99 87 (EE) Unknown 100 100 0	70.1% Very good	Read 505 Write 244 Mixed 161 66% 303 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 73.5 4K Mixed 10.1 92% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 25.3 69% 145 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 80%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 169 2158 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 157 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 334 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 109 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 45 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 111 (C2) HDA temperature 112 92 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	102% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 177 Mixed 140 123% 165 MB/s	4K Read 1.01 4K Write 2.62 4K Mixed 0.36 131% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 109%
Kingston HyperX Savage USB 3.1 64GB-$48 753 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 53GB free, PID 16b3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 284 Write 104 Mixed 126 186% 171 MB/s	4K Read 6.59 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.73 80% 2.74 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA84GR7MFR4N-UH 1x31GB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	44% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 13 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 13.9 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback