Acer Aspire X1800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire X1800  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire X1800
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 05 '21 at 18:36
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2210
Intel, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 29.9
2-Core 62.4
39% 56.2 Pts
4-Core 60.3
8-Core 62.8
8% 61.5 Pts
64-Core 62.3
4% 62.3 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7100 / nForce 630i
Acer(1025 0158) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.05% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.1
Parallax 0.1
0% 0.1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.05%
Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 40 44 38 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 53.1
Write 58.8
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 46.4
34% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 54%
PS01 USB DISK Pro 1GB
0GB free, PID 1a00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 9.2
Write 7.7
Mixed 7.7
10% 8.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
29% 1.8 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT25664AA800.C16FH CT25664AA800.C16FH 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.77 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X1800 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X1800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback