HP ProBook 650 G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProBook 650 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1993
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '21 at 13:24
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4000M-$259
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 73
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 121
53% 86.5 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 186
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
2.5" SATA SSD 3ME3 64GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S17411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 79 80 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 296
Write 75
Mixed 92.7
SusWrite 79.2
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 3.5
26% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 34.3
DQ Mixed 19.7
18% 27.6 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 36%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 8GB
6GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 3.5 3.8 3.1 4.1 3.1 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 6.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 3.8
12% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.2
145% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8.6
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 650 G1 Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 650 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback