Lenovo F0EK007HUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo F0EK007HUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3701
Memory18.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '21 at 18:56
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 89.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 250
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 911
84% 704 Pts
64-Core 929
58% 929 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 3701) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 10
Parallax 8.6
5% 8.13 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXH7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1246 989 326 323 323 323 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 677
Write 1,597
Mixed 695
SusWrite 588
202% 889 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 52.5
173% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,006
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 248
263% 462 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 142%
Great: 279%
Asmt ASM105x 500GB
203GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 186 193 187 191 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 289
Write 221
Mixed 240
SusWrite 190
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 20
69% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 89.7
DQ Write 94.3
DQ Mixed 67
57% 83.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 77%
Asmt ASM105x 500GB
172GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 185 194 187 192 193 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.2% Average
Read 285
Write 213
Mixed 232
SusWrite 190
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 18.3
66% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 89.9
DQ Write 83.3
DQ Mixed 96
69% 89.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 77%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 150 148 151 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 101
Write 134
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 147
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
179% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 10TB
5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 174 187 182 187 187 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFD832A.C16FN RAMAXEL RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 24GB
3200, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 25.7
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 26.2
76% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F0EK007HUS Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo F0EK007HUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback