Acer Nitro AN515-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Freed_CFS
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181205
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 02 '21 at 09:23
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 147
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 381
39% 314 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1264) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5018
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.31% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 6.4
5% 12.3 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.7
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.31%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sp-5 PRO 256GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 911XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 138 129 169 65 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 1,336
Write 208
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 108
90% 426 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 4.2
56% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 518
DQ Write 422
DQ Mixed 240
243% 394 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 192%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
323GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 70 74 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 109
Write 106
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 73.2
56% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 11.2
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-52 Builds (Compare 5,517 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback