Acer Veriton X498G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Veriton X498G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton X490G
Memory4.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '21 at 23:18
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3440
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 75.2
1-Core 34.6
2-Core 51.8
39% 53.9 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 241
20% 172 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 84DD) 2GB
CLim: 1398 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 19.5
17% 19.8 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 17.7
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 480GB-$89
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B180517a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 6.1 11 61 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.3% Poor
Read 196
Write 70.2
Mixed 114
SusWrite 49.8
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 14.1
43% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 67.6
DQ Mixed 85.5
70% 103 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 99%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
672GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 122 122 124 130 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 36.2
Write 157
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 122
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
50% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
131GB free
Firmware: HPH3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 127 129 127 132 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 142
Write 132
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 128
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 88%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB
924GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 14 15 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
5.11% Terrible
Read 9.5
Write 8.4
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 14.2
14% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 5.11%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0198 0198 9905471-006.A00LF 0198 16GB
1334, 1334, 1334, 1334 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
21.6% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.1
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton X498G Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton X498G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback