HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3397
Memory	2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	May 01 '21 at 16:17
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 200 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 364 50% 371 Pts	64-Core 379 23% 379 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 3397) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.46% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 3.4 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.46% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9TB8W512G1001 512GB 464 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 434GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6106101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 385 386 389 395 392 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Read 447 Write 439 Mixed 298 SusWrite 390 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 48 4K Mixed 33.6 112% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 274 DQ Mixed 264 211% 298 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 114%
Jmicron Tech 500GB 1,136 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 64GB free Firmware: 0208 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 25 21 20 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Read 33.4 Write 24.5 Mixed 27.6 SusWrite 23.5 20% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 7.8 1,336% 7.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 65%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 97GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 2.3 9 14 12 16 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 31.9 Write 20.6 SusWrite 9.4 23% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.7 38% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 2x2GB 1,198 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	48% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 15 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15.5 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 73 55% 73 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,768 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,046x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	973x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	402x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	383x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	337x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	209x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	120x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	42x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	48x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	27x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16