Asus P5G41C-M LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5G41C-M LX  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110117
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateJul 10 '17 at 23:31
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 41.6
2-Core 85
42% 65 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 165
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 3800
Nvidia(10DE 0661) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
6.46% Terrible
Lighting 8.77
Reflection 7.77
Parallax 4.06
7% 6.87 fps
MRender 7.52
Gravity 6.83
Splatting 5.04
5% 6.47 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.46%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM10.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.5% Below average
Read 159
Write 129
Mixed 108
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 9.55
68% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 51.3
DQ Mixed 5.11
13% 27.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 97%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
907GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 66.4
Write 61.5
Mixed 64.2
48% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.17
68% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 59%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
126GB free
Firmware: JF100-19 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 68.3
Write 71.4
Mixed 72.6
53% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.39
89% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 42%
Kingston Wi-Drive 32GB
29GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.78% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 13.3
Mixed 12.8
18% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.48
4K Write 0.06
4K Mixed 0.57
38% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.78%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5G41C-M LX Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5G41C-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback