HP Z230 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Z230 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1905
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200422
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 01 '21 at 06:41
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3-$245
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 69.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 221
73% 133 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 569
60% 481 Pts
64-Core 565
35% 565 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 13.9
Reflection 16
Parallax 10.9
11% 13.6 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 14.8
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 11%
Intel HD Graphics P4600
HP(103C 1905) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5166
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 6.9
3% 4.43 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500480G 480GB
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 168 146 209 147 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 477
Write 407
Mixed 359
SusWrite 207
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 39.8
139% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 184
159% 236 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 95%
Sobetter Ext 1TB
525GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 21 21 21 22 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
3.23% Terrible
Read 22.4
Write 22.9
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 20.4
5% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.6
4% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 77%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
524GB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 149 151 152 151 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 150
Write 139
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 150
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
222% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 29.6
Write 25.1
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 29.6
21% 28 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.7
229% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 89%
iCatchte iCatchtek SPCA63 32GB
24GB free, PID 6331
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 6.5 6.5 6.6 6.5 6.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.89% Terrible
Read 7.7
Write 7.5
Mixed 8
SusWrite 6.6
10% 7.45 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.89%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-026.A00LF 99U5474-038.A00LF 99U5474-038.A00LF 9905471-006.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.7% Average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 14.3
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z230 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 2,725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z230 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback