Monster ABRA A5 V15.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V15.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V15.2
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190716
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 30 '21 at 12:07
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 87.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 230
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 761
74% 607 Pts
64-Core 832
52% 832 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 1064) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9219
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.49% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 70.7
Parallax 7.2
5% 28 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9.7
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.49%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-RC500 500GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA12.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 632 545 535 540 549 416 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 792
Mixed 154
SusWrite 536
94% 411 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 51.6
161% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 603
DQ Write 1,058
DQ Mixed 658
548% 773 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 126%
Great: 233%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 11.3
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 13.4
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V15.2 Builds (Compare 479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Monster ABRA A5 V15.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback