Monster ABRA A5 V15.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V15.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V15.2
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190716
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateNov 22 '20 at 16:08
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 165
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 777
76% 624 Pts
64-Core 946
58% 946 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 1064) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.48% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 59
Parallax 8.09
5% 24.5 fps
MRender 8.38
Gravity 6.67
Splatting 15.2
9% 10.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.48%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-RC500 500GB
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA12.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1251 426 565 436 314 524 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 687
Write 1,155
Mixed 810
SusWrite 586
184% 810 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 48.6
161% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,257
DQ Write 759
DQ Mixed 972
734% 996 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 158%
Great: 233%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V15.2 Builds (Compare 479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Monster ABRA A5 V15.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback