ADD TO PC
BUILD

Mobiledemand Flex10B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Mobiledemand Flex10B (all builds)
Motherboard	MobileDemand To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	800 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200713
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '21 at 21:15
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Memory 39.6 1-Core 50.6 2-Core 100 36% 63.5 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 198 27% 199 Pts	64-Core 194 12% 194 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0100 2782) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6444 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.94% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 2.3 2% 2.2 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 3.4 2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.94% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Garmin GARMIN Flash 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 2d83 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	5.19% Terrible	Read 3.2 Write 5 Mixed 3.7 SusWrite 3.9 6% 3.95 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1 79% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.19% Great: 7%
Garmin GARMIN Card 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 29GB free, PID 2d83 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	5.7% Terrible	Read 3 Write 2 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 0.5 2% 2 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.7 117% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.7% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB 5,404 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 11 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4.2 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 204 20% 204 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 27%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback