Asus A68HM-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus A68HM-K (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20181017
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '21 at 17:15
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7680 Radeon R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G 2,565 User benchmarks, average bench 43% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Memory 67.1 1-Core 68.9 2-Core 129 53% 88.3 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 222 30% 221 Pts	64-Core 220 14% 220 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 120GB-$98 9,315 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 67 75 79 75 83 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.6% Below average	Read 206 Write 38.6 Mixed 99.2 SusWrite 74.9 23% 105 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 9.8 4K Mixed 10.6 56% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 73.5 DQ Mixed 9.7 31% 68.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 84%
3 12 0GB SSD 42 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 83GB free Firmware: FW20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 93 68 19 46 20 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	55.5% Above average	Read 393 Write 336 Mixed 308 SusWrite 96.8 63% 284 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 61.7 4K Mixed 10.6 93% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 218 DQ Mixed 18.5 56% 118 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 72%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$41 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 123GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 110 109 111 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 114 Write 113 Mixed 67.3 SusWrite 108 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50 10,446 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 143GB free Firmware: AX00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 70 63 69 62 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 37.7 Write 41 SusWrite 66.7 35% 48.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 75% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39% Below average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 16.2 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 11 25% 8.9 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A68HM-K Builds (Compare 639 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-K

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	79x
Athlon X4 840 Quad CoreAMDBench 45%, 4,588 samples	76x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	58x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	68x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	23x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	9x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	115x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	63x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	60x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16