Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display720 x 480 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 28 '21 at 14:13
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 87.1
1-Core 152
2-Core 302
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 591
8-Core 1,041
98% 816 Pts
64-Core 1,518
94% 1,518 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Sapphire(1DA2 E410) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 149
Parallax 248
120% 181 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 153
Splatting 99.9
100% 125 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 111%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$30
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT303.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 232 215 225 228 214 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,406
Write 1,214
Mixed 1206
SusWrite 265
228% 1,023 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 60.9
258% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 843
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 317
301% 487 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 176%
Great: 223%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
83GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 492 493 492 493 493 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 492
Mixed 470
SusWrite 492
111% 491 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 62.9
212% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 369
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
96GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 493 493 493 493 494 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 492
Mixed 476
SusWrite 493
111% 494 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 62.5
211% 76 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
785GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 494 494 492 494 495 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 493
Mixed 461
SusWrite 494
111% 491 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 68.5
227% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 371
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 138%
Great: 137%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
880GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 114 112 111 111 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 112
Write 42.1
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 112
54% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
210% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 110%
Corsair Voyager LS 124GB
114GB free, PID 1a0b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 17 12 15 11 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
9.54% Terrible
Read 38.7
Write 38.2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 15.1
29% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.4
58% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.54%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 37.4
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 37.3
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback