SZMZ X99M-G2

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	SZMZ X99M-G2 (all builds)
Motherboard	SZMZ X99M-G2
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200811
Uptime	18 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '21 at 13:45
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 10,197 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 88.3 1-Core 104 2-Core 215 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 519 52% 424 Pts	64-Core 567 35% 567 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% PowerColor(148C 2379) CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	47.3% Average	Lighting 60.3 Reflection 59.9 Parallax 88.7 49% 69.6 fps	MRender 59.5 Gravity 61.8 Splatting 43.2 44% 54.8 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 500GB 1,800 User benchmarks, average bench 230% 436GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0918A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1399 1402 1394 1444 1447 1449 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	226% Outstanding	Read 1,508 Write 1,438 Mixed 994 SusWrite 1,423 302% 1,340 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 157 4K Mixed 24.6 169% 72.5 MB/s	DQ Read 699 DQ Write 677 DQ Mixed 451 404% 609 MB/s
Poor: 136% ↑ This bench: 226% Great: 319%
VendorCo ProductCode 2TB 2,637 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 2TB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 1.8 3.6 13 3.2 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	5.68% Terrible	Read 22.1 Write 3.8 Mixed 19 SusWrite 5.3 15% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 21% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.68% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$57 31,641 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	59.6% Above average	MC Read 23.9 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 19.3 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 17.7 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99M-G2 Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

System: SZMZ X99M-G2

CPU
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	22x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	14x
Xeon E5-2630L v3IntelBench 67%, 702 samples	12x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	17x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	9x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	6x

SSD
SSD 120GBGigabyte $30Bench 70%, 13,685 samples	7x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	5x
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	4x

RAM
Atermiter 1x8GBUnknownBench 30%, 346 samples	11x
HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 1x16GBHynixBench 37%, 604 samples	8x
18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 2x8GBMicronBench 59%, 641 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $160

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16