MSI X99S MPOWER (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99S MPOWER (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '17 at 20:02
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$143
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 75
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 190
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 648
61% 506 Pts
64-Core 847
52% 847 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Palit(1569 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 67.3
Parallax 60
53% 64 fps
MRender 72.3
Gravity 60.3
Splatting 53.8
50% 62.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
285GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 503
Write 347
Mixed 282
83% 377 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 19.7
110% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 67.2
89% 162 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 496
Mixed 345
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 42.8
151% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 124
123% 196 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
473GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 156
Mixed 131
114% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.19
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 0.18
110% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL15-15-15 D4-2400 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 43
MC Mixed 39.2
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 101%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99S MPOWER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99S MPOWER (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $453
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback