Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120806
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 27 '21 at 18:45
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 161
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 402
41% 332 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Gigabyte(1458 34FC) 1GB
CLim: 715 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 13.9
12% 16.3 fps
MRender 22.2
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 14.4
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
750GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 131 133 132 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 356
Write 212
Mixed 258
SusWrite 132
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 31.5
101% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 205
153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
455GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 102 102 104 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 96.9
Write 56.3
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 103
59% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 178 180 181 180 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 121
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 177
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
811GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 100 100 101 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 139
Write 120
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 98.9
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 76%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 14TB
11.5TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 122 123 124 123 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
Read 239
Write 188
Mixed 134
SusWrite 124
219% 171 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 13.6
4K Mixed 1.4
582% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 4
DQ Write 5.5
DQ Mixed 0.9
232% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 108%
Great: 123%
Samsung D3 Station 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 6125
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 116 117 116 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 161
Write 121
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 115
150% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.1% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 15.6
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 11.8
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $437
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback