Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8259
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181109
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '21 at 13:34
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 85.9 1-Core 107 2-Core 204 76% 132 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 566 59% 473 Pts	64-Core 585 36% 585 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% HP(103C 8259) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Lighting 30.2 Reflection 37.4 Parallax 30.6 25% 32.7 fps	MRender 34.7 Gravity 32.1 Splatting 19.6 23% 28.8 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 25%
Intel HD Graphics 630 310,249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 8259) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	4.74% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 36.7 Parallax 7.4 5% 16.8 fps	MRender 9.9 Gravity 6.8 Splatting 0.1 4% 5.6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.74% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500M8480G 480GB 1,552 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 226GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RR SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 188 151 202 151 81 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	91% Outstanding	Read 457 Write 397 Mixed 337 SusWrite 174 76% 341 MB/s	4K Read 38.3 4K Write 91.4 4K Mixed 44 163% 57.9 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 169 154% 236 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 94%
Toshiba MQ04ABD200 2TB 1,687 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: JT000C SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 114 117 119 118 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Read 140 Write 144 Mixed 53.3 SusWrite 117 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.6 229% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GB 23,910 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 22.2 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 22 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,155x
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	989x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	812x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	469x
MZNTY128HDHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 4,948 samples	214x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	188x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	341x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	309x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 36,396 samples	292x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16