Lenovo 20FXS15K00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20FXS15K00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FXS15K00
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190728
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateApr 27 '21 at 09:30
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 210
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 528
56% 447 Pts
64-Core 533
33% 533 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 76%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 5050) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.28% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 6.8
5% 7.93 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.2
6% 7.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.28%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 385 384 395 408 407 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 351
Write 391
Mixed 364
SusWrite 394
85% 375 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 32.8
93% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 72.3
DQ Mixed 141
124% 193 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 23.6
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 24.3
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback